Edward Codon believes that UFO’s do
not exists He concludes that there has been no scientific knowledge gained from
the twenty-one year study of UFOS. He also supports his argument by stating
that there is proof of the “thing” in the sky being something else but not the
UFO, and that the reason we don’t study more about the UFO is because
scientists have better progression to make in science rather than of something
that doesn’t exist. The second scientist, J. Allen Hynek, believes that there
is a possibility that UFO’s exist. The evidence used is the reported sightings
of the UFO by people.
Additionally, he believes that to make some progress, we need more data
to make the final call. The last scientist Royston Paynter is unsure whether
UFO’s are real or unreal. He argues that we should have physical evidence,
which supports the belief that UFO’s are real and that aliens are smart enough
to not leave evidence, if they were in fact real. I believe that Paynter has
the best argument because he actually looks at it from both sides and proves
that there is no direct legitimate evidence to prove either side of argument.
No comments:
Post a Comment